Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| sip:fent [2010/11/09 11:05] – created tibor | sip:fent [2010/11/09 11:49] (current) – tibor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| The Internet Gate can enable SIP connectivity for remote users that use NAT devices without SIP support. It can adapt to characteristics of remote NAT devices. | The Internet Gate can enable SIP connectivity for remote users that use NAT devices without SIP support. It can adapt to characteristics of remote NAT devices. | ||
| - | You might need to purchase a [[: | + | **Using FENT you can allow people behind non-SIP-capable NAT firewalls |
| - | FENT sends keep-alive packets | + | :!: You might need to purchase a [[: |
| + | You configure FENT on the [[:web GUI: | ||
| + | |||
| + | FENT sends keep-alive packets to remote SIP clients behind non-SIP-capable firewalls to keep the SIP communications channel open to them. The keep-alive packets are SIP messages that are sent more often than the remote firewall' | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are two methods used for keep-alive: | ||
| + | * **REGISTER**: | ||
| + | * **OPTIONS**: | ||
| + | You can enable both methods, then the REGISTER method is tried first and if it does not work properly the OPTIONS method is used. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Shortest media path ===== | ||
| + | By enabling **Detect endpoints behind same NAT** you allow SIP clients behind the same remote NAT making local calls to each other to send media locally between them on that LAN. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
